Saturday, 3 October 2026Updated 34m ago
← Top stories
Legal▼ Bearish for Swiggy

Swiggy 'cost for two' misleading? What Delhi consumer court's ₹1 lakh order means for diners

1 source · first seen 22:42 2 Oct · updated 22:42 2 Oct

The brief

Written from 1 report · check the source before you trade
  • A Delhi consumer court ordered Swiggy and a restaurant to pay ₹1 lakh compensation
  • The order concerned unfair trade practices
  • The ruling adds consumer-protection scrutiny for Swiggy and India’s food-delivery sector

Tags on this story

Pick a tag to see all its stories

Linked by the tag Food delivery

12 stories this week
  1. 1 OctTelangana suspends licences of Swiggy Instamart, Flipkart, Zepto dark stores over food safety violationsPolicy · 2 sources · Telangana suspended licences of Swiggy Instamart, Flipkart and Zepto dark stores over food safety violations
  2. 28 SeptFSSAI crackdown puts food safety on hiring menuPolicy · 2 sources
  3. 27 SeptAmazon wades into India’s fast delivery battleground: ‘DoorDash on steroids’Expansion · 1 source
All Food delivery stories →

Read the reports

1 report · earliest 22:42
MintSwiggy 'cost for two' misleading? What Delhi consumer court's ₹1 lakh order means for diners22:42